Harris v. Maturecare of Standifer Place, LLC
Plaintiff: Ruth Harris
Defendant: Maturecare of Standifer Place, LLC
Case Number: 1:2014cv00064
Filed: March 4, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Chattanooga Office
County: Bradley
Presiding Judge: William B Carter
Presiding Judge: Curtis L Collier
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM: the Court will DENY Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Court File No. 15 ). An order shall enter. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 8/5/2015. (BJL, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Maturecare of Standifer Place, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ruth Harris
Represented By: Valerie W Epstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maturecare of Standifer Place, LLC
Represented By: Joseph R White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?