Campbell v. Carter County Detention Center et al
| Carter Campbell |
| Carter County Detention Center and Dr Paul |
| 2:2012cv00424 |
| October 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Greeneville Office |
| Carter |
| William B Carter |
| Harry S Mattice |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff therefore is ASSESSED the full filing fee of three-hundred, fifty dollars ($350.00). The custodian of plaintiff's inmate trust account at the institution where he now resides is DIRECTED to submit to the Clerk of Court, twenty percent (20%) of plaintiff's preceding monthly income credited to the account, but only when the amount in the account exceeds ten dollars ($10), until the full $350 fee has been paid t o the Clerk. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to the custodian of inmate trust accounts at plaintiff's current place of confinement to ensure compliance with the assessment procedures outlined herein. Accordingly, this case will be dismissed by separate order. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 11/30/2012. (BJL)***Mailed to Carter Campbell and the Carter County Detention Center Custodian of Inmate Accounts.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
