Taylor v. Mathis et al (JRG2)
| Steven M Taylor |
| Chris Mathis, C/O Buckles, Tom Smith and Ron Street |
| 2:2014cv00265 |
| September 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Greeneville Office |
| Carter |
| J Ronnie Greer |
| Dennis H Inman |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM OPINION: For these reasons, the motion for summary judgment [Doc. 61] will be GRANTED and the cause of action against Chief Street and Cpt. Smith will be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time [Doc. 64] will be GRANTED nunc pro tunc, and motions to show cause, to compel, for counsel, and to deem service of process effective [Docs. 58, 65, 66, 74] will be DENIED. Because plaintiff failed to effectuate service of process and the sta tute of limitations has lapsed, the cause of action against Officer Buckles will be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Because plaintiff failed to name the John Doe jailers within the statute of limitations, the cause of action against those defendants will be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court will be DIRECTED to CLOSE the case. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 02/23/2017. (C/M to pro se Plaintiff) (AMP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
