Cable v. Tenn. Department of Correction

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Eastern District Cable v. Tenn. Department of Correction

Cable v. Tenn. Department of Correction

Petitioner:	John Franklin Cable
Respondent:	Tenn. Department of Correction
Case Number:	2:2014cv00332
Filed:	November 7, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office:	Greeneville Office
County:	Morgan
Presiding Judge:	J Ronnie Greer
Presiding Judge:	Dennis H Inman
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 1, 2016	Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION: For the reasons discussed above, Respondents motion to dismiss [Doc. 6] will be GRANTED and Petitioners habeas action will be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. AN APPROPRIATE ORDER WILL ENTER. See order for details. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 3/1/2016. (c/m to pro se petitioner) (RLC, ) Modified on 3/1/2016 reflect copy mailed (RLC, ).
January 28, 2015	Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve copies of the petition and this Memorandum and Order upon the respondent and the Attorney General for The State of Tennessee. Since it does not plainly appear from the face of the petition that it should be summarily dismissed, the respondent is hereby ORDERED to answer or otherwise respond to the petition within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 1/28/2015. (c/m to pro se petitioner, Atty Gen State of Tennessee and respondent David Sexton, Warden) (RLC, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 1, 2016

Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION: For the reasons discussed above, Respondents motion to dismiss [Doc. 6] will be GRANTED and Petitioners habeas action will be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. AN APPROPRIATE ORDER WILL ENTER. See order for details. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 3/1/2016. (c/m to pro se petitioner) (RLC, ) Modified on 3/1/2016 reflect copy mailed (RLC, ).

January 28, 2015

Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve copies of the petition and this Memorandum and Order upon the respondent and the Attorney General for The State of Tennessee. Since it does not plainly appear from the face of the petition that it should be summarily dismissed, the respondent is hereby ORDERED to answer or otherwise respond to the petition within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 1/28/2015. (c/m to pro se petitioner, Atty Gen State of Tennessee and respondent David Sexton, Warden) (RLC, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cable v. Tenn. Department of Correction
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: John Franklin Cable
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Tenn. Department of Correction
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?