The New London Tobacco Market, Inc. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

Plaintiff: The New London Tobacco Market, Inc.
Defendant: Philip Morris USA, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2013cv00081
Filed: February 14, 2013
Court: Tennessee Eastern District Court
Office: Knoxville Office
County: Knox
Referring Judge: H Bruce Guyton
Presiding Judge: R Leon Jordan
Nature of Suit: Torts to Land
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 15, 2013 13 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND OPINION as set forth in following order. Signed by District Judge R Leon Jordan on 5/15/13. (ABF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The New London Tobacco Market, Inc. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The New London Tobacco Market, Inc.
Represented By: Garrett P Swartwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Philip Morris USA, Inc.
Represented By: Shayne R Clinton
Represented By: Gregory G Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.