Southern Forest Watch, Inc. et al v. Salazar et al
| Southern Forest Watch, Inc., John Walton Quillen, Earl Rob Cameron and Gregory D. Bostick |
| Kenneth Lee Salazar, Jonathan B. Jarvis, Dale A. Ditmanson and Alan Sumeriski |
| 3:2013cv00116 |
| March 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Blount |
| H Bruce Guyton |
| Joseph M Hood |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 1156 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM OPINION: The Court finds that defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on all claims and their motion for summary judgment [Doc. 64 ] will be granted. Further, plaintiff's motion to vacate [Doc. 44 ] will be denied. An appropriate order will be entered. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on 3/30/15. (JBR)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER granting in part 14 the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss in that Plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge the imposition of an online reservation system, and DENIED IN PART, in that Plaintiffs may proceed on their claims challenging the imposition of the backpacker permit camping fee and decision to grant a license; denying without prejudice 25 Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery. Signed by District Judge Joseph M Hood on March 24, 2014. (AYB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
