New London Tobacco Market, Inc. v. Burley Stabilization Corp.

Plaintiff: New London Tobacco Market, Inc.
Defendant: Burley Stabilization Corporation
Case Number: 3:2013cv00122
Filed: March 4, 2013
Court: Tennessee Eastern District Court
Office: Knoxville Office
County: Jefferson
Referring Judge: H Bruce Guyton
Presiding Judge: R Leon Jordan
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1446 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 15, 2013 13 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND OPINION as set forth in following order.Signed by District Judge R Leon Jordan on 5/15/13. (ABF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: New London Tobacco Market, Inc. v. Burley Stabilization Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: New London Tobacco Market, Inc.
Represented By: Garrett P Swartwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Burley Stabilization Corporation
Represented By: Shayne R Clinton
Represented By: W Brantley Phillips, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.