Royston v. Fleming et al
| Johnny Frank Royston |
| James Fleming and Cherry Lindamood |
| 3:2014cv00121 |
| March 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Hardeman |
| Pamela L Reeves |
| C Clifford Shirley |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, the Clerk is DIRECTED to file this action without the prepayment of costs or fees or security therefor as of the date the complaint was received. However, for the reasons stated below, process shall not iss ue at this time. The claim arose at the Whiteville Correctional Facility in Whiteville, Tennessee, which is within the Western District of Tennessee. Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to transfer this case to the United States District Court f or the Western District of Tennessee, Eastern Division, at Jackson, Tennessee. Because the plaintiff is in the custody of the Tennessee Department of Correction, he is herewith ASSESSED the civil filing fee of $350.00, with payments to be subm itted as set forth. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 5/6/14. (c/c, cc Warden of the Whiteville Correctional Facility, the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Correction, the Attorney General for the State of Tennessee and Court's financial deputy)(ADA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
