Rhodes v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Eastern District Rhodes v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Rhodes v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Plaintiff:	Michael Rhodes
Defendant:	Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Case Number:	3:2014cv00130
Filed:	March 31, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office:	Knoxville Office
County:	Blount
Presiding Judge:	Thomas A Varlan
Presiding Judge:	C Clifford Shirley
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 17, 2015	Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report andRecommendation. It isORDERED, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings 13 is DENIED; the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment 14 is GRANTED; the Commissioners decision in this case denying plaintiff's application for benefits under the Social Security Act is AFFIRMED; and this case is DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on 8/17/15. Entered as Judgment by the Clerk. (ADA)
July 31, 2014	Filing 11 Memorandum and Order. The Court finds the Motion to Substitute Party [Doc. 9] is well-taken, and it is GRANTED. Rosalind Rhodes shall be SUBSTITUTED as the Plaintiff of record in this case. Rosalind Rhodes added. Michael Rhodes terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Clifford Shirley, Jr on 7/31/14. (JBR)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 17, 2015

Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report andRecommendation. It isORDERED, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings 13 is DENIED; the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment 14 is GRANTED; the Commissioners decision in this case denying plaintiff's application for benefits under the Social Security Act is AFFIRMED; and this case is DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on 8/17/15. Entered as Judgment by the Clerk. (ADA)

July 31, 2014

Filing 11 Memorandum and Order. The Court finds the Motion to Substitute Party [Doc. 9] is well-taken, and it is GRANTED. Rosalind Rhodes shall be SUBSTITUTED as the Plaintiff of record in this case. Rosalind Rhodes added. Michael Rhodes terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Clifford Shirley, Jr on 7/31/14. (JBR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rhodes v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Rhodes
Represented By:	Robert A McNees, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?