Gentry v. Nicely et al
| Gary L Gentry |
| Dennis Nicely, Scott Graves, Earl Loy, Jr and Union County |
| 3:2014cv00191 |
| May 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Union |
| H Bruce Guyton |
| Pamela L Reeves |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that the Defendants motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED, with prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to remove the trial scheduled for December 1, 2015, from the courts docket. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 5/5/15. (c/m) (ABF)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting 23 Defendants Dennis Nicely, Scott Graves, and Early Loy Jr.'s Motion to Compel. Plaintiff is ORDERED to serve counsel for the Defendants with full and complete responses to the interrogatories and request s for production served September 12, 2014, on or before February 13, 2015. The Plaintiff is hereby ADMONISHED that failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order or any other Order of the Court in the future is likely to result in the impositi on of sanctions including an award of fees and/or a recommendation that these cases be dismissed, pursuant to Rule 37(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on January 14, 2015. Copy of order mailed to Plaintiff on 1/14/2015. (RLK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
