Dotson v. Knox County, Tennessee et al (TV1)
Jarod D Dotson |
Knox County, Tennessee, Knox County Sheriff's Department, Robert Frank Phillips, Ronald Chaperon, Jr., Brandon Gilliam, John Does and Jane Does |
3:2015cv00066 |
February 11, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Knoxville Office |
Knox |
Thomas A Varlan |
C Clifford Shirley |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court hereby DENIES as moot the Motion to Dismiss of Knox County and All Defendants in their Official Capacity [Doc. 13 ]; DENIES as moot the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Knox County Sheriff' ;s Office [Doc. 14 ]; GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint [Doc. 16 ]; DENIES IN PART AND GRANTS IN PART Knox County's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint; and DENIES the Motion of D efendants Chaperon and Gilliam in their Individual Capacity for More Definite Statement [Doc. 20 ]. Plaintiff shall have fourteen (14) days from entry of this order to file an amended complaint that is consistent with this opinion. All responsive pleadings shall be due within fourteen (14) days of the filing of the amended complaint. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 12/8/15. (JBR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.