Hunter et al v. Helton et al
| Jerry Lee Hunter and Joey Q. Perryman |
| Les Helton and Sabrina Patterson |
| 1:2010cv00021 |
| March 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Columbia Office |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER:The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 62 ) is hereby ACCEPTED AND APPROVED, and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 44 ) is hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 10/11/2011. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb) Modified text on 10/11/2011 (hb).
|
|
Filing
62
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge Bryant recommends thatthe motion to dismiss for Defendants Helton and Patterson 44 be Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 8/11/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 34 is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Petition for Permanent Injunctive Relief 3 is DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to seek injunctive relief at trial. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge in accordance with the Courts prior Order 21 . Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 1/31/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
34
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 3 MOTION for Permanent Injunction filed by Jerry Lee Hunter be DENIED. Any party has 14 days from service of this Report and Recommendation in which to file any written objections to this Recommendation, with the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 01/12/2011. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(ab)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 06/10/2010. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(ab)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER: The Clerk is directed to SEVER plaintiff Hunter's complaint from plaintiff Perryman's complaint. The Clerk is further directed to FILE a copy of the complaint, the envelope in which the complaint was mailed to the district court, an d a copy of this Order under a DIFFERENT miscellaneous case number for plaintiff Perryman. Henceforth, the plaintiffs' complaints will be treated as two separate actions. Plaintiff Hunter has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperi s. (Docket No. 2). However, his application to proceed in forma pauperis is defective because he has not provided a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint as required by 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(a)(2). Therefore, the plaintiff shall submit to the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order either a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement for the 6-month period immediat ely preceding the date that he receives this order, or the full three hundred fifty dollar ($350.00) filing fee. Plaintiff Hunter is forewarned that, if he does not comply with this order within the time specified, the Court is required to presume that he is not a pauper, assess the full amount of filing fee, and order the case dismissed for want of prosecution. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 4/8/10. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(af)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
