Beaty v. Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Beaty v. Social Security Administration

Beaty v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Sara Mae Beaty
Defendant:	Social Security Administration
Case Number:	2:2011cv00058
Filed:	May 31, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Cookeville Office
County:	Pickett
Presiding Judge:	E. Clifton Knowles
Presiding Judge:	John T. Nixon
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 28, 2014	Filing 15 ORDER: The Court finds substantial evidence in the record supported the ALJ's decision and therefore, ADOPTS the Report 12 . Plaintiff's Motion 6 is DENIED and decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. The Commissioner's Motion t o Stay Because of Lapse of Appropriations 14 is TERMINATED AS MOOT. This Order terminates this Court's jurisdiction over the above-styled action, and the case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 3/28/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
April 30, 2013	Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 6 MOTION for Judgment on the Record: For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgement on the Administrative Record be DENIED, and that the decision of theCommissioner be AFFIRMED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 4/30/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 28, 2014

Filing 15 ORDER: The Court finds substantial evidence in the record supported the ALJ's decision and therefore, ADOPTS the Report 12 . Plaintiff's Motion 6 is DENIED and decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. The Commissioner's Motion t o Stay Because of Lapse of Appropriations 14 is TERMINATED AS MOOT. This Order terminates this Court's jurisdiction over the above-styled action, and the case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 3/28/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

April 30, 2013

Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 6 MOTION for Judgment on the Record: For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgement on the Administrative Record be DENIED, and that the decision of theCommissioner be AFFIRMED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 4/30/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beaty v. Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sara Mae Beaty
Represented By:	John W. Allen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?