Tucker v. Metropolitan Police Dept. et al
Petitioner: Jesse B. Tucker
Respondent: Metropolitan Police Dept., Ronal E. Serpas, Duane Phillips, North Crime Suppression Unit, Jean McCormick and Yannick Dislavries
Case Number: 3:2008cv00522
Filed: May 21, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: John S. Bryant
Presiding Judge: William J. Haynes
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER: After de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's 94 Report and Recommendation and the Plaintiff's objections, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Defendants 72 motion for judgment on the pleadings is GR ANTED; Plaintiff's 65 motion for summary judgment is DENIED; and Plaintiff's 92 motion to stay is DENIED as moot. The Plaintiff's 97 Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. Signed by District Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 09/08/2010. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(ab)
June 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER granting 78 Motion for Leave to File Response to the Reply. Signed by District Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 6/17/10. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tucker v. Metropolitan Police Dept. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jesse B. Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Metropolitan Police Dept.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ronal E. Serpas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Duane Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: North Crime Suppression Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jean McCormick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Yannick Dislavries
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?