Watson Carpet & Floor Covering, Inc. v. Mohawk Industries, Inc. et al
| Watson Carpet & Floor Covering, Inc. |
| Mohawk Industries, Inc., Carpet Den, Inc. and Rick McCormick |
| 3:2009cv00487 |
| May 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| John S. Bryant |
| Thomas Wiseman |
| Anti-Trust |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
256
ORDER: For the reasons explained in the Memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, Defendant Mohawk Industries, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 116) is hereby DENIED. Furthermore, Plaintiff's Motion to Ascertain Status (Docket Entry No. 254) is hereby DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/2/2014. (ds)
|
|
Filing
252
ORDER: For the reasons stated above, the undersigned Magistrate Judge finds that Watson's motion to compel 100 should be DENIED. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 9/20/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
251
ORDER: For the reasons stated in this order, the undersigned Magistrate Judge GRANTS Mohawks motion to compel 99 . Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 9/19/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
250
ORDER granting 98 Motion for leave to file a reply brief in support of its motion for leave to add expert. Mohawk may disclose any additional expert witness on the issue of Watson's damages and serve an expert witness report on or before O ctober 17, 2013. If Mohawk designates such an expert, Watson shall have until Thursday, November 14, 2013, within which it may designate a responding expert witness on this issue and serve its report. The parties may depose any additional expert witnesses so designated on or before Friday, December 13, 2013. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 9/18/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
249
ORDER denying 206 , 207 , 215 and 235 Motions in Limine. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/12/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
234
ORDER: For the foregoing reason, the undersigned Magistrate Judge finds that Defendant's motion to strike the rebuttal expert witness report of James D. Reitzes should be DENIED without prejudice to Defendant's right to file a properly su pported motion seeking to exclude portions of Mr. Reitzes's testimony from evidence. The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE as moot Defendant's motion to ascertain status of motion to strike 90 . It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 3/22/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER granting 84 Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 8/2/12. (dt)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER: Joint MOTION to Continue Trial and Amend Initial Case Management Order 76 is Granted. Jury Trial is reset for 3/12/2013 at 9:00 AM before District Judge Kevin H. Sharp. Pretrial Conference is reset for 2/22/2013 at 1:30 PM before District Judge Kevin H. Sharp. The deadlines for trial-related matters will be addressed in a subsequent Order closer to the trial date. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/22/12. (dt)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the two separate contemporaneously filed Memorandum Opinions, the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 14 ) and the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 17 ) are GRANTED and this matter DISMISSED in its entirety. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendants Mohawk Industries, Carpet Den, and Rick McCormick. This is a final judgment for purposes of Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, from which an appeal may lie. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas Wiseman on 8/27/09. (km)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
