K & S Associates, Inc. v. American Association of Physicists in Medicine
Plaintiff: K & S Associates, Inc.
Defendant: American Association of Physicists in Medicine
Case Number: 3:2009cv01108
Filed: November 18, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: John S. Bryant
Presiding Judge: John T. Nixon
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 15 Antitrust Litigation
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 173 ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Court FINDS IN FAVOR of Defendant American Association of Physicists in Medicine and AGAINST Plaintiff K & S Associates, Inc. on Plaintiff's ant itrust claim for the alleged violation Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §1. The Agreed Temporary Restraining Order (Docket No. 16) shall remain in full force and effect until the time for filing an appeal has expired, or the appeal has been concluded. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 5/20/13. (af)
January 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 141 ORDER: The Magistrate Judge certifies this matter ready for trial, and the Clerk is directed to forward the file to the District Judge. Unless otherwise directed by the District Judge, there appear to be no further proceedings to be conducted before the Magistrate Judge. Judge Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant no longer assigned to case. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 1/14/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
September 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 134 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in this memorandum, pltf's 82 Renewed Motion to Compel Production of Legal Opinion Memorandum is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 9/21/12. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(rd)
July 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 130 MEMORANDUM OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 7/26/12. (rd)
December 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER granting 60 Motion to Preclude Deft from Relying on an Advice of Counsel Defense. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 12/14/11. (tmw)
January 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER denying 36 Motion to Compel. Signed by District Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 01/26/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Text Searchable Order) (ab)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: K & S Associates, Inc. v. American Association of Physicists in Medicine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: K & S Associates, Inc.
Represented By: Leon H. Wolf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Association of Physicists in Medicine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?