Premier Global Production Company, Inc. v. Megas Productions et al
| Premier Global Production Company, Inc. |
| Megas Productions and Richard Howard |
| 3:2011cv00996 |
| October 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Joe Brown |
| Kevin H. Sharp |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
DEFAULT JUDGMENT: Plaintiff has filed a Second Amended Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants (Docket Entry No. 28). The Clerk previously refused to grant default judgment on the grounds that Plaintiff's requested relief was not with in the Clerk's authority to grant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(1)(Docket Entry No. 25). The Plaintiff has modified the relief sought in the pending motion such that it is a sum certain and may be granted by the Clerk. Acc ordingly, the Clerk hereby enters default judgment as requested in the amount of $396,697.00 against Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(1) for the reasons stated in Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support (Docket Entry No. 29) and as supported in the Declaration of Kevin Blevins, Business Manager of Premier Global Production Company, Inc. (Docket Entry No. 29-1).(xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (af)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
