Prickette et al v. Lind et al
| Jeremy Prickette and Amy Prickette |
| Radiology Associates, P.C., Roger C. Lind, Doug Hong, Gateway Health System, Inc. and Gateway Medical Center |
| 3:2012cv01267 |
| December 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Montgomery |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| E. Clifton Knowles |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER: Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand 12 . For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Plaintiffs' Motion is GRANTED, and this action is remanded to the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Tennessee. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 3/1/13. (xc:Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Tennessee, along w/cert copy of docket sheet) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference reset for 4/9/2013 at 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles. Prior to the hearing, counsel for the parties are directed to confer on a Proposed Case Management Order for the progression of this case, which shall be submitted three (3) days prior to the Case Management Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 2/22/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
