Doughtie & Company, Inc. v. Rutherford County et al
Plaintiff: Doughtie & Company, Inc.
Defendant: Rutherford County, Rutherford County Probate Clerk's Office, Lisa Crowell, Tennessee Sixteenth Judicial District Clerk and Master's Office and John Bratcher
Case Number: 3:2013cv00209
Filed: March 11, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Rutherford
Presiding Judge: Joe Brown
Presiding Judge: Todd J. Campbell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER: Pending before the Court is Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket No. 35 ). For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants' Motion is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. The pretrial confe rence set for June 30, 2014, and the jury trial set for July 8, 2014, are canceled. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 10/8/13. (la)
August 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER denying 34 Joint Motion to modify the Initial Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 8/22/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(la)
August 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OF THE COURT: Pending before the Court is an Application for Injunctive Relief (Docket No. 22 ) filed by the Plaintiff. The Application asks this Court to issue a preliminary injunction requiring Defendants to place The Rutherford Read er, a newspaper owned and operated by Plaintiff, on their respective lists of publications eligible to publish legal notices. For the reasons described, the Application is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 8/5/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(la)
May 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER: Jury Trial set for 7/8/2014 at 9:00 AM before District Judge Todd J. Campbell. Pretrial Conference set for 6/30/2014 at 10:30 AM before District Judge Todd J. Campbell. Exhibit List and Witness List due by 6/23/2014. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 6/23/2014. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 5/8/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
May 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 5/7/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
March 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management. Discovery is not stayed absent order of the District Judge. This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Judge. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 3/11/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doughtie & Company, Inc. v. Rutherford County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Doughtie & Company, Inc.
Represented By: Barry R. Tidwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rutherford County
Represented By: Edward Evan Cope
Represented By: James C. Cope
Represented By: Blake Allan Garner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rutherford County Probate Clerk's Office
Represented By: Edward Evan Cope
Represented By: James C. Cope
Represented By: Blake Allan Garner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lisa Crowell
Represented By: Edward Evan Cope
Represented By: James C. Cope
Represented By: Blake Allan Garner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tennessee Sixteenth Judicial District Clerk and Master's Office
Represented By: Edward Evan Cope
Represented By: James C. Cope
Represented By: Blake Allan Garner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Bratcher
Represented By: Edward Evan Cope
Represented By: James C. Cope
Represented By: Blake Allan Garner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?