Quality Manufacturing Systems, Inc. v. R/X Automation Solutions, Inc.
| Quality Manufacturing Systems, Inc. |
| R/X Automation Solutions, Inc. |
| 3:2013cv00260 |
| March 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Rutherford |
| William J. Haynes |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
189
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: RXAS's motion (Docket Entry 90 ) will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Early in this case, the Court found that the Agreement did not restrict QMSI's right to create its own competing pill counter. (Docket En try 58, pp. 10-11). As such, this information is irrelevant to RXAS's breach of contract counterclaim. The Court sees no reason to change the AEO designation on this particular set of materials. Insofar as RXAS's motion seeks to re-desig nate QMSI's information regarding its own competing pill counter from AEO to CPO, the motion is DENIED. The Court recently found, as a matter of law, that the Agreement obligated QMSI to share pill counter modification suggestions with RXAS, but only pertaining to RXASs S-4 pill counter. (Docket Entry 188). As RXAS is entitled to this information, RXAS's motion to re-designate QMSIs information regarding its attempted and/or successful modifications to RXASs pill counter from AEO to CPO will be GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 5/13/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
176
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Defendant R/X Automation Solutions, Inc. (RXAS) has twice moved the Court to compel discovery. (Docket Entries 65, 84, and 86). Plaintiff Quality Manufacturing Systems, Inc. (QMSI) has responded to these motions. (Docket Entr ies 70 and 105). RXAS filed a reply. (Docket Entry 122). For the following reasons, the first motion to compel (Docket Entry 65 ) will be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, and the second motion to compel (Docket Entries 84 and 86 ) will be GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 3/30/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Court finds that QMSI's cross-motion for partial summary judgment should be GRANTED. The Court finds, as a matter of law, the Pill Counter Agreement between the parties remains in effect and binding, and that RXAS' s announced intention to terminate the Agreement as of July 2013 violated the terms of the Agreement. All other issues in this case, including damages, are expressly reserved. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 9/30/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 33 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 3/31/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER granting 50 Motion for Leave to File Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 11/21/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
