Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Tennessee Commerce Bank v. Ashmore
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Tennessee Commerce Bank |
| James Ashmore |
| 3:2013cv00519 |
| May 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Williamson |
| Joe Brown |
| John T. Nixon |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER re telephone conference held on 8/13/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 8/15/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting in part 14 Motion to Compel, denying 19 Motion to Quash, and denying 22 Motion to Quash. Counsel for the Defendant and Fiserv are directed to confer and see if they can agree on an appropriate protective order, the scope of the emails, and who will do the recovery and search and provide a deadline for completion of such discovery by July 18, 2014. Objections must be called to the Magistrate Judges attention on or before July 25, 2014. The scheduling order in the case 9 is MODIFIED to provide that discovery may remain open until September 8, 2014. Dispositive motions will be filed by October 6, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 7/2/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ds)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER: Telephone Conference set for 7/1/2014 at 11:00 AM to discuss the pending motion to compel. To participate in the conference call, parties will call 615-695-2851 at the scheduled time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 6/18/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER: The Defendant in this case has filed a motion to compel 14 . While this motion to compel involves a nonparty, it also involves the FDIC, which is a party. The parties and counsel for Fiserv, Inc. will confer and schedule a telephone conference with me about this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 6/17/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Tennessee Commerce Bank v. Ashmore | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Tennessee Commerce Bank | |
| Represented By: | Richard C. Mangelsdorf, Jr. |
| Represented By: | John M. Hull |
| Represented By: | Craig R. Allen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: James Ashmore | |
| Represented By: | Nader Baydoun |
| Represented By: | Camille M. Chandler |
| Represented By: | Stephen C. Knight |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
