Henderson v. Atkins North America, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Henderson v. Atkins North America, Inc.

Henderson v. Atkins North America, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Tiffany R. Henderson
Defendant:	Atkins North America, Inc.
Case Number:	3:2014cv00824
Filed:	March 24, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	Todd J. Campbell
Presiding Judge:	Juliet E. Griffin
Nature of Suit:	Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 7, 2014	Filing 19 ORDER: Telephone conference held on 8/7/2014, at which time the following matters were addressed: 1. The parties were not able to reach a resolution during the EEOC mediation. 2. The plaintiff will not seek to add the claims she made in the EEOC c harge into this case. 3. All depositions for proof shall be taken by 12/12/2014, in the event that any such depositions are actually needed and unless an unexpected need for such a deposition arises after December 12, 2014. 4. Any discovery motion shall be filed by 12/22/2014. 5. Since defendant's counsel expressed some willingness to explore the potential for resolving the FLSA claims in this case separately from the EEOC claims, the plaintiff will relay to defendant's counsel a settlement demand relating to the claims in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 8/7/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 7, 2014

Filing 19 ORDER: Telephone conference held on 8/7/2014, at which time the following matters were addressed: 1. The parties were not able to reach a resolution during the EEOC mediation. 2. The plaintiff will not seek to add the claims she made in the EEOC c harge into this case. 3. All depositions for proof shall be taken by 12/12/2014, in the event that any such depositions are actually needed and unless an unexpected need for such a deposition arises after December 12, 2014. 4. Any discovery motion shall be filed by 12/22/2014. 5. Since defendant's counsel expressed some willingness to explore the potential for resolving the FLSA claims in this case separately from the EEOC claims, the plaintiff will relay to defendant's counsel a settlement demand relating to the claims in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 8/7/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Henderson v. Atkins North America, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Atkins North America, Inc.
Represented By:	Craig A. Cowart
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany R. Henderson
Represented By:	Michael L. Russell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?