Branch v. Metropolitan Nashville and Davidson County et al
| Emmonie Branch |
| Metropolitan Nashville and Davidson County, Daron Hall, Ronnie Davis, Rose Watkins, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 |
| 3:2014cv01271 |
| June 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| William J. Haynes |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 55) to grant Defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 53). Plaintiff has not filed an objection. Afte r de novo review, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, Defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 53 ) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. This is the Final Order in this action. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 8/31/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(eh) Modified on 9/1/2015 (eh).
|
|
Filing
55
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 53) be granted and the complaint dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 8/11/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
