Vantrease v. Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Vantrease v. Social Security Administration

Vantrease v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Quintilla Maria Vantrease
Defendant:	Social Security Administration
Case Number:	3:2014cv01321
Filed:	June 18, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	Todd J. Campbell
Presiding Judge:	Juliet E. Griffin
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 8, 2015	Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 16), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. T he Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket No. 14 ) is DENIED, and the determination of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. All matters having been determined, the Clerk is directed to close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 6/8/2015. (eh)
May 18, 2015	Filing 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the administrative record (Docket Entry No. 14) be DENIED and the Commissioner's decision be AFFIRMED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 5/18/2015. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 8, 2015

Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 16), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. T he Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket No. 14 ) is DENIED, and the determination of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. All matters having been determined, the Clerk is directed to close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 6/8/2015. (eh)

May 18, 2015

Filing 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the administrative record (Docket Entry No. 14) be DENIED and the Commissioner's decision be AFFIRMED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 5/18/2015. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vantrease v. Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quintilla Maria Vantrease
Represented By:	David Clyde Downard
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By:	Mercedes C. Maynor-Faulcon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?