BNSF Railway Company v. Tennessee Department of Revenue et al
BNSF Railway Company |
Tennessee Department of Revenue and Richard Roberts |
3:2014cv01399 |
June 30, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
E. Clifton Knowles |
Kevin H. Sharp |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 MEMORANDUM signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 10/10/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb) |
Filing 25 ORDER granting 22 Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 8/21/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting 19 Joint Motion to Reset Initial Case Management Conference. The Initial Case Management Conference is hereby RESET to August 29, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 7/31/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting 16 Joint Motion to Continue Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Motion Hearing reset for 8/29/2014 at 10:30 AM before District Judge Kevin H. Sharp. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 7/18/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ds) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.