Peterson v. Haslam et al
Kenneth Peterson |
The Tenn. Attorney General and Bill Haslam |
3:2014cv01718 |
August 21, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
John T. Nixon |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER: The petitioner is hereby GRANTED thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order on the docket in which to submit to the Clerk of this Court either the full appellate filing fee of five hundred five dollars ($505) or an applicatio n to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this order to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 9/3/2014. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail). (xc: 6CCA via email).(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ds) |
Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The petitioner's plea for clemency, pardon or some type of sentencing relief does not suggest confinement in violation of federal law. Therefore, the petitioner has failed to state a claim upon which relief under 28 U.S .C. § 2254 can be granted. For that reason, the petition is DENIED and this action is hereby DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 8/22/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.