Woodard v. Corizon, Inc. et al
| Tracy Woodard |
| Corizon, Inc., John Doe, f/n/u Boyd, f/n/u Sader, Mike Johnson, f/n/u Simmons, f/n/u Qualls, Otis Campbell and Kevin Rae |
| 3:2014cv01725 |
| August 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| William J. Haynes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 82 .) The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and co nducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 70 ) is GRANTED. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter judgment in ac cordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) (2006). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 12/8/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb) Modified text on 12/9/2016 (hb).
|
|
Filing
82
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 70 First MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 11/15/2016. Despite the Plaintiff's failure to respond to the motion for summary judgment and the statement of material facts, th e Magistrate Judge has carefully reviewed the record to insure the motion is well supported and recommends that the motion for summary judgment be granted and the claims against all Defendants be dismissed with prejudice and that any appeal from a dismissal of the Plaintiff's claims not be certified as taken in good faith. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 18 ) to dismiss Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Johnson, Qualls and Simmons with prejudice. Plai ntiff has not filed an objection. After de novo review, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, and Plaintiffs claims against these Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 5/21/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
18
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint. For the reasons stated above, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that the plaintiff has failed to state a claim against the defendants Johnson, Qualls and Simmons, and that all claims against them should be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 4/20/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER: IFP granted; Filing Fee of $350.00 assessed; Case dismissed with prejudice; Clerk to send copy to Warden of Turney Center. Entry of this order shall constitute the judgment in this action. Signed by Chief Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 9/2/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
