Burns v. Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Burns v. Social Security Administration

Burns v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Gloria Jean Burns
Defendant:	Social Security Administration
Case Number:	3:2014cv01817
Filed:	September 9, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Wilson
Presiding Judge:	Kevin H. Sharp
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 1, 2016	Filing 18 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 17) is ACCEPTED and APPROVED. Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket No. 12) is GRANTED. The decision of the SSA is REVERSED. This matter is REMANDED for fur ther administrative proceedings consistent with this decision, including rehearing. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 4/1/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
March 10, 2016	Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: In light of the foregoing, the Magistrate Judge recommends that plaintiff's motion for judgment be GRANTED and that the decision of the SSA be REVERSED and the cause REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with this Report, to include rehearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 3/10/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 1, 2016

Filing 18 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 17) is ACCEPTED and APPROVED. Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket No. 12) is GRANTED. The decision of the SSA is REVERSED. This matter is REMANDED for fur ther administrative proceedings consistent with this decision, including rehearing. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 4/1/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)

March 10, 2016

Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: In light of the foregoing, the Magistrate Judge recommends that plaintiff's motion for judgment be GRANTED and that the decision of the SSA be REVERSED and the cause REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with this Report, to include rehearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 3/10/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burns v. Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gloria Jean Burns
Represented By:	Howard D. Olinsky
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?