Troutman v. The Logistics Group, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Troutman v. The Logistics Group, LLC

Troutman v. The Logistics Group, LLC

Plaintiff:	Dennis H. Troutman
Defendant:	The Logistics Group, LLC
Case Number:	3:2014cv02327
Filed:	December 3, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	E. Clifton Knowles
Presiding Judge:	William J. Haynes
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 6, 2016	Filing 9 ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 8), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is ado pted and approved. Accordingly, the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute the action. Any other pending Motions are DENIED AS MOOT, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/6/2016. (jw)
April 18, 2016	Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: As of the date of the filing of this Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's previous Order. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 4/18/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 6, 2016

Filing 9 ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 8), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is ado pted and approved. Accordingly, the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute the action. Any other pending Motions are DENIED AS MOOT, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/6/2016. (jw)

April 18, 2016

Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: As of the date of the filing of this Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's previous Order. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 4/18/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Troutman v. The Logistics Group, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dennis H. Troutman
Represented By:	Andy L. Allman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: The Logistics Group, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?