Bassham v. Branson et al
| James Edward Bassham |
| Derrick Schofield, f/n/u Gibson, Carl Fuerst, Dennis Davis, Jeremy Cantrell, Julia Campbell, Charles Branson, Bruce Westbrooks and Tennessee Department of Corrections |
| 3:2014mc00657 |
| April 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Kevin H. Sharp |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby DENIED. The plaintiff is GRANTED thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order on the docket in which to remit the full filing fee of four hundred dollars ($400.00). Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 5/14/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER: The plaintiff is hereby GRANTED thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order on the docket In which to either pay the civil filing fee of four hundred dollars ($400.00) or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis along with a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the previous six month period. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 4/16/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail along w/blank ifp app and copy of AO No. 93.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
