Carlson v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
| Christine A. Carlson |
| Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company |
| 3:2015cv00200 |
| March 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| Juliet E. Griffin |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 52 ) is ADOPTED, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Record (Doc. No. 44 ) is GRANTED IN PART with respect to remanding the case to the Plan Admini strator and DENIED IN PART in all other respects, Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the record is DENIED, and the case is REMANDED to the Plan Administrator for further proceedings consistent with this Order. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 1/23/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
|
|
Filing
52
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, the Magistrate Judge respectfully recommends that: (1) Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the record (DE 44 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant's motion for judgme nt on the record (DE 42 ) be DENIED. Any party has fourteen (14) days from service of the Report and Recommendation in which to file any written objections to it with the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 10/20/17. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Pending before the Court is the Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record (THE "Motion to Supplement") (Docket No. 29 ), filed by Plaintiff Christine Carlson (the "Plaintiff" or "Carlson"). Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (the Defendant or Reliance Standard) opposes the Motion to Supplement. See Docket Nos. 30 and 33. For the reasons discussed herein, the Motion to Supplement is GRANTED. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall supplement the administrative record in this proceeding with (i) the OME Amendment Report and (ii) the final investigative report prepared on behalf of Plaintiff, including witness statements. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 9/19/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Carlson v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christine A. Carlson | |
| Represented By: | Jack L. Byrd |
| Represented By: | Stephen E. Grauberger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Brandon B. Cate |
| Represented By: | Justin D. Wear |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
