Starks v. Wilson County Jail et al
Michael Demond Starks |
Robert Bryan, f/n/u Bennett, Doug Whitefield, f/n/u Shoemake, f/n/u Brown, f/n/u Apple, Stacy Swindell, f/n/u Denson, f/n/u Rollard and f/n/u Smith |
3:2015cv00358 |
April 1, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Wilson |
Joe Brown |
John T. Nixon |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Pending before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) (6). (Doc. No. 22 .) On December 17, 2015, Magistrate Judge Brown issued a Report and Recomme ndation recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be granted. (Doc. No. 48 at 2122.) The Report and Recommendation provided that either party could file an objection within fourteen days. (Id. at 22.) Neither party has filed an object ion. Upon review, the Court finds the Report and Recommendation to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, Starks' federal claims are DISMISSED with prejudice, his state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE the case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 1/25/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 4/13/2015. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (ds) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.