Saulter v. Social Security Administration
| Keith Saulter |
| Social Security Administration |
| SSA-Email Notification |
| 3:2015cv00524 |
| May 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| John S Bryant |
| John T Nixon |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 37 MANDATE of USCA as to #29 Notice of Appeal filed by Keith Saulter: Pursuant to the court's disposition that was filed 08/30/2017 the mandate for this case hereby issues today. (dt) |
| Filing 36 INFORMATION COPY from 6CCA: Saulter's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED for the purposes of this appeal and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED. (MANDATE TO ISSUE)(dt) |
| Filing 35 GREEN CARD RETURNED Executed as to #32 Order. (hb) |
| Filing 34 GREEN CARD RETURNED Executed as to #31 Order. (hb) |
| Filing 33 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #31 Order #32 Order. (mg) |
Filing 32
ORDER: Plaintiff's pending IFP application (ECF No. 30) is DENIED. Plaintiff is notified that if he does not file a motion in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals or pay the $505 appellate filing fee within 30 days of receiving notice of this order, the appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Callihan, 178 F.3d at 804. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to furnish a copy of this Order to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 10/7/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail. 6CCA by email.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
|
|
Filing 31
ORDER denying as moot #30 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Accordingly, Plaintiff's pending IFP application (ECF No. 30) is DENIED. Pursuant to Rule 24(a)(5) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff may nonetheless file, within 30 days after service of this Order, a motion directly in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for leave to proceed as a pauper on appeal. Owens v. Keeling, 461 F.3d 763, 775 (6th Cir. 2006); Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999). The motion should comply with the requirements stated in Rule 24(a)(1), by (A) showing Plaintiff's inability to pay in full the appellate filing fee; (B) claiming an entitlement to redress; and (C) stating the issue Plaintiff intends to present on appeal. Plaintiff is notified that if he does not file a motion in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals or pay the $505 appellate filing fee within 30 days of receiving notice of this order, the appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Callihan, 178 F.3d at 804. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to furnish a copy of this Order to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 10/7/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(6CCA by email.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
| USCA Case Number 16-6476, Case Manager Louise Schwarber. (hb) |
| Filing 30 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Keith Saulter. (hb) |
| Filing 29 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #25 Order by Keith Saulter. (hb) |
| Filing 28 GREEN CARD RETURNED Executed as to #25 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations and #26 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (hb) |
| Filing 27 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #25 Order & #26 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT . (mg) Modified on 8/31/2016 (af). |
| Filing 26 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT re #25 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (hb) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff's Motion and AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner. It is so ORDERED Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 8/29/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Filing Medical Records by Keith Saulter (hb) |
| Filing 23 GREEN CARD RETURNED Executed as to #21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (hb) |
| Filing 22 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #21 Report and Recommendation. (hb) |
| Filing 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Social Security Complaint. If plaintiff's medical condition has in fact worsened to the point that he is now precluded from performing substantial gainful activity, a new application for disability benefits may prove fruitful. However, as to the SSA's decision on the claims under review here, it is clear that substantial evidence supports that decision, and that it should therefore be AFFIRMED. It is so recommended. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 8/5/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb) |
| Filing 20 Medical Records filed by Keith Saulter (hb) |
| Filing 19 Document titled Social Security/Disability filed by Keith Saulter (hb) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE filed by Social Security Administration re #17 Notice (Other) filed by Keith Saulter . (Maynor-Faulcon, Mercedes) |
| Filing 17 SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS filed by Keith Saulter. (dt) |
| Filing 16 GREEN CARD RETURNED Executed as to #14 Order. (hb) |
| Filing 15 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #14 Order. (jw) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER: To facilitate review of the administrative decision, the plaintiff is directed to file a motion for judgment on the administrative record supported by a brief within thirty (30) days of entry of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 7/29/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
| Filing 13 SSA Administrative Record filed per #12 Answer to Social Security Complaint.. (Maynor-Faulcon, Mercedes) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Social Security Complaint by Social Security Administration.(Maynor-Faulcon, Mercedes) |
| TN BAR STATUS for Mercedes C. Maynor-Faulcon verified as active. (hb) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Mercedes C. Maynor-Faulcon on behalf of Social Security Administration (Maynor-Faulcon, Mercedes) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney on 6/15/2015 (hb) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Social Security Administration served on 6/8/2015. (afs) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney on 6/4/2015 (hb) |
| Filing 7 GREEN CARD RETURNED Executed as to #3 Order. (hb) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing regarding Social Security Benefits by Keith Saulter (hb) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #3 Order. (hb) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Summons fwd to USMS this date for service. (hb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 5/11/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
| NOTICE to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & pleading form with certificate of service included). (hb) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Keith Saulter. (hb) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, filed by Keith Saulter. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Envelope)(hb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
