Gray v. Davis County, Utah
| 1:2005cv00140 |
| November 14, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Northern Office |
| Tena Campbell |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 41 Report and Recommendations, Memorandum Decision. Granting 37 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Davis County, Utah. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 6/2/2010. (las)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM DECISION - REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 37 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Davis County, Utah. It is recommended that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted because Plaintiff has failed to r aise a genuine issue of material fact as to any of his claims. Further, Plaintiff has failed to make a timely response to the motion, or to the order taking the motion under advisement.( Objections to R&R due by 3/30/2010), re 37 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Nuffer on 3/15/2010. (rlr) .
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gray v. Davis County, Utah | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
