Mitchell et al v. Smith
| John Mitchell, Dennis E. Mulqueen and Dennis S. Mulqueen |
| Frank T. Smith, III |
| 1:2008cv00103 |
| August 27, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Rich |
| Ted Stewart |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM DECISION that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment on behalf of Plaintiffs and against Defendant on all claims. Plaintiffs are awarded $431,457.50 in damages. The amount of $425,492.50 in damages will be contingent upon Plaintiffs quitclaim of all rights in the Elk Ridge Phase II property. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case forthwith. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 05/25/2011. (asp)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 52 Motion for Summary Judgment re: Rescission of 40+ Acres Contract. Plaintiffs, or entities in the control, shall convey by quitclaim deed the 44 acres to Defendant. The Clerk of Court shall enter a monetary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Smith as described in the order. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 4/21/2011. (las)
|
|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. See Order for Details. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 12/14/2010. (las)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 16 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 03/31/2009. (asp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
