Carter v. Crowther
Petitioner: Douglas Stewart Carter
Respondent: Steven Turley
Case Number: 2:2002cv00326
Filed: April 22, 2002
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
Presiding Judge: Ted Stewart
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 576 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDERgranting 558 Petitioners Renewed Motion to Stay Proceedings ; denying 564 Carters Motion to Supplement the Petition without prejudice ; granting 566 Respondents Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 2/29/2016. (jds)
February 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 575 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 566 Motion to Stay.. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 2/26/2016. (jds)
December 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 530 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 517 Motion for Relief from Judgment. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 12/20/12. (ss)
November 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 516 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 511 Motion to Alter Judgment. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 11/13/2012. (asp)
September 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 508 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 154 Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, denying 480 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 09/11/2012. (asp)
January 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 491 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 478 Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 01/20/2012. (tls)
December 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 477 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying and striking 446 Petitioner's Motion to Amend; denying and striking 448 Petitioner's Motion to Stay; granting 452 Motion to Strike; granting 456 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 12/06/2011. (tls)
October 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 437 MEMORANDUM DECISION and Orderdenying without prejudice 414 Petitioner's Motion to Stay Proceedings Pursuant to Rhines v. Weber. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 10/24/2011. (tls)
June 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 412 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying as moot 351 Motion for Discovery ; denying as moot 369 Motion for Discovery ; denying as moot 376 Motion for Modification of Factual Development Schedule ; granting 378 Motion to Reconsider re 347 Order ; vacatin g 347 The Courts prior order allowing further factual development ; granting 390 Motion to Quash ; denying as moot 394 Motion to Strike. The remaining claims in the Second Amended Petition are now ripe for decision. Petitioner shall file his brief on the merits of his claims by August 29, 2011. Respondents brief is due by October 31, 2011. Petitioner may file a reply brief by November 30, 2011. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 06/24/2011. (asp)
March 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 365 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 360 Motion to Quash. It is Ordered that the parties meet and confer on appropriate language for a protective order to safeguard the information to be disclosed and submit a protective order with appropriate limitations and restrictions on use and further disclosure to the Court within 14 days of this Order. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 3/17/2011. (las)
December 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 347 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Granting Petitioner's Request for Further Factual Development. Within 14 days of this Order, Petitioner shall submit a proposed scheduling order for the Court's signature. Respondent may file a response to the proposed scheduling order 14 days thereafter. The Court finds the pending Motions for Discovery are Moot. finding as moot 165 Motion for Discovery; finding as moot 169 Motion for Discovery. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 12/9/2010. (las)
November 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 344 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 336 Motion to Unseal Documents. It is Ordered that the Clerk of Court unseal Docket Nos. 311 and 318 . Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 11/12/2010. (las)
July 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 323 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting in part 110 Motion by Clint Friel to dismiss petition for writ of habeas. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 07/20/2010. (asp)
October 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 307 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 292 Motion for Ruling ; denying 292 Motion for Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 10/15/2009. (asp)
July 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 296 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 291 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 07/15/2009. (asp)
October 9, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 270 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 267 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 10/09/2008. (asp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carter v. Crowther
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Douglas Stewart Carter
Represented By: Paula K. Harms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Steven Turley
Represented By: Thomas B. Brunker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?