Trans-Western Petroleum v. Wolverine Gas and Oil et al
Case Number: 2:2006cv00801
Filed: September 20, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
Presiding Judge: Ted Stewart
Presiding Judge: Paul M. Warner
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 164 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 148 Motion in Limine ; granting 154 Motion to Amend/Correct ; denying 157 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 08/23/2012. (asp)
December 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 133 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 127 Motion to Quash Subpoena. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 12/15/2011. (tls)
January 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 117 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 106 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Court grants Trans-Western's Motion on its claims for declaratory relief, breach of contract, and quiet possession, but denies its request for an entry of damages at this juncture. Disputed material facts remain which preclude this Court from entering damages in this matter and the determination of damages will therefore be reserved for later proceedings. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 1/24/2011. (las)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trans-Western Petroleum v. Wolverine Gas and Oil et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?