Mohammed v. Davis County Sheriffs Office
Farhan Mohammed |
Davis County Sheriffs Office |
2:2007cv00637 |
August 27, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Central Office |
Salt Lake |
Ted Stewart |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 102 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 85 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 1/7/2011. (mas) |
Filing 38 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 36 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 09/24/2008. (asp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mohammed v. Davis County Sheriffs Office | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Farhan Mohammed | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Davis County Sheriffs Office | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.