UBS Bank USA v. Mullins
Plaintiff: UBS Bank USA
Defendant: Hal S. Mullins
Case Number: 2:2008cv00814
Filed: October 21, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Salt Lake
Presiding Judge: Ted Stewart
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 102 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting in part and denying in part 94 Motion for Attorney Fees. Fees and costs are awarded as follows. Riker Danzigs attorneys are billed at a rate of $210 per hour, for 459.80 hours, for a total amount of $95,927 .15 Andersons attorney is billed at a rate of $210 per hour, for 18.75 hours, for a total amount of $3,982.50. Total costs as requested are $3,877.06. And thus, Plaintiffs counsel is entitled to total attorneys fees and costs in the amount of $103,786.56. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 02/15/2012. (tls)
July 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 90 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting in part and denying in part 77 Motion for Summary Judgment. It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 77) isGRANTED as to the claims for breach of contract and account stated and DENIED as to theclaim for unjust enrichment. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 07/18/2011. (tls)
March 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 62 Motion to Compel. It is Ordered that Mr. Mullins has 30 days to provide responses to Plaintiff's discovery requests and interrogatories. It is further Ordered that Plaintiffs request for the attorneys& #039; fees, costs, and the expenses incurred in bringing this motion is Denied without Prejudice. Plaintiff may renew this request if Defendant fails to provide the requested discovery pursuant to this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 3/2/2011. (las)
November 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 49 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Erik A. Christiansen withdrawn from case; denying 54 Motion for Extension of Time. It is Ordered that within 20 days of the entry of this Order, Defendant shall notify the clerk of court of the appointment of another attorney or of his decision to appear pro se. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 11/29/2010. (las)
August 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting Defendants Rule 56(f) Request ; denying 32 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 08/23/2010. (asp)
February 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 21 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 02/11/2010. (asp)
May 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 11 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 05/19/2009. (asp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UBS Bank USA v. Mullins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UBS Bank USA
Represented By: Thomas R Karrenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hal S. Mullins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?