International Coal Group et al v. Tetra Financial Group
| International Coal Group and ICG Hazard |
| Tetra Financial Group |
| 2:2009cv00115 |
| February 9, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Clark Waddoups |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 68 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 9/9/2010. (jtj)
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 50 Motion to Quash. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 5/24/2010. (las)
|
|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 35 Motion to Amend Counterclaim. Defendant shall file its amended counterclaim within ten days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 3/8/2010. (las)
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER granting 24 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff's shall provide full responses to Defendant's Document Requests No. 8 and 9 within 30 days of the date of this order. The parties' requests for reasonable expenses are Denied. Because the court has granted Defendant's motion, it follows that Plaintiffs are not entitled to such an award. At the same time, the court has determined that the circumstances do not support such an award to Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 2/2/2010. (las)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
