Isaacs v. Wells et al
| Garry P. Isaacs |
| Randy Wells, Bradley B. Wells, Vapocom and Highpointe Homes |
| 2:2010cv00162 |
| February 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Utah |
| Dale A. Kimball |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 4 Motion to Strike the First Through Seventh Affirmative Defenses ; granting 11 Motion for Joinder of Necessary Party; denying 12 Motion to Strike ; denying 16 Motion for Pretrial Conference Hearing. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 8/5/2010. (las)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER re 3 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim filed by Vapocom, Randy Wells, Bradley B. Wells, Highpointe Homes, Darrin Sweeney. The "Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaim" (docket 3 ) as it pertains to defendants Highpointe Home s LLC, Vapocom LLC and Highpointe Companies LLC is STRICKEN as improperly filed by an individual that is not a licensed attorney. These business entities may have until 5:00 p.m. on 5/13/2010 to find counsel to represent them in this matter, including filing an Answer to the Complaint. Plaintiff may file a Motion for Default Certificate if answers have not been filed by that deadline. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 4/6/2010. (ce)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
