SkipPrint v. Rastar
Plaintiff: SkipPrint
Defendant: Rastar
Case Number: 2:2013cv00039
Filed: January 16, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Salt Lake
Presiding Judge: Dee Benson
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 0145 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 19 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Accordingly, the claims for contributory and induced infringement within Counts I-V of plaintiffs amended complaint are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 8/16/13. (jlw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SkipPrint v. Rastar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SkipPrint
Represented By: Nathaniel L. Dilger
Represented By: Christopher W. Arledge
Represented By: Rachel Jacques
Represented By: Joseph K. Liu
Represented By: Charles J. Veverka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rastar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?