Arnett v. Arnett

Defendant: Thomas N. Arnett, Jr.
Plaintiff: Beth A. Arnett
Case Number: 2:2013cv01121
Filed: December 24, 2013
Court: Utah District Court
Office: Central Office
County: Salt Lake
Presiding Judge: Paul M. Warner
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 9, 2014 31 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 19 Motion for Leave to File; denying 12 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 16 Motion for Sanctions. On or before 6/23/14, the parties shall, using the court's standard forms, file an Attorneys' Planning Meeting Report. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 6/9/14 (alt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arnett v. Arnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas N. Arnett, Jr.
Represented By: Craig G. Adamson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beth A. Arnett
Represented By: Wesley D. Hutchins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.