Al-Fouzan v. ActiveCare et al
| Fouzi Al-Fouzan |
| ActiveCare, James Joseph Dalton, ADP Management and 4G Biometrics |
| 2:2015cv00373 |
| May 21, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Utah |
| Brooke C. Wells |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Count Three of the Amended Complaint (Fraud against ActiveCare) is DISMISSED. Count Four of the Amended Complaint (Fraud against ADP) is DISMISSED. Count Seven of the Amended Complaint (Conspiracy to Commit Fraud) is DISMISSED as regards ActiveCare and ADP but will proceed against 4G and Dalton. All other relief requested is hereby Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 9/6/2016. (las)
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER finding as moot 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ; granting in part and denying in part 21 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff shall have fourteen (14) days fr om the date this order was issued in order to file an amended complaint that is in accordance with this Order. An initial pre-trial conference will be held for scheduling purposes on April 20, 2016 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 3/21/2016. (las)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
