AVT California v. Arrow Recycling Solutions et al
AVT California |
KTK, A Plus Businesses, Patricia Kunnel, Arrow Recycling Solutions, Steve Peake, Brian Murray, VJW and Douglas Kunnel |
2:2019cv00939 |
November 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Paul M Warner |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 MOTION to Dismiss Party Brian Murray and Memorandum in Support , MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Brian Murray. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Brian Murray, #2 Exhibit 2 - Office Locations of Opus Bank)(Young, Spencer) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting #19 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #2 Complaint. Answer deadline updated for Brian Murray answer due 1/17/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 1/3/2020. (nl) |
Filing 19 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Brian Murray. (Young, Spencer) Modified on 1/3/2020 event corrected to Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer(nl). |
Filing 18 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by AVT California as to Steve Peake served on 12/20/2019, answer due 1/10/2020. (Ensor, Richard) |
Filing 17 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by AVT California as to KTK served on 12/3/2019, answer due 12/24/2019. (Ensor, Richard) |
Filing 16 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by AVT California as to VJW served on 12/3/2019, answer due 12/24/2019. (Ensor, Richard) |
Filing 15 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by AVT California as to A Plus Businesses served on 12/3/2019, answer due 12/24/2019. (Ensor, Richard) |
Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #7 Summons Issued Electronically, Acknowledgment filed by AVT California.Brian Murray served on 12/13/2019, answer due 1/3/2020. (Ensor, Richard) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Spencer W. Young on behalf of Brian Murray (Young, Spencer) |
Filing 12 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to VJW. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh) |
Filing 11 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Steve Peake. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh) |
Filing 10 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Patricia Kunnel. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh) |
Filing 9 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to KTK. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh) |
Filing 8 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Douglas Kunnel. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh) |
Filing 7 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Brian Murray. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh) |
Filing 6 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to A Plus Businesses. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh) |
Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Arrow Recycling Solutions. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 11/25/2019. (nl) |
Filing 3 EXHIBITS filed by AVT California re #2 Complaint. (Ensor, Richard) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3426918) filed by AVT California. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner (Ensor, Richard) |
Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner. Plaintiff AVT California is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (tlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.