Silver v. Doubles et al
| Frederick O Silver and Frederick O. Silver |
| Brian D Doubles and Synchrony Bank |
| 2:2022cv00578 |
| September 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| David Barlow |
| Jared C Bennett |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
The deadline for submission of Consent/Reassignment form has now passed. The party did not file, therefore the case is ineligible for magistrate assignment. Case randomly assigned to Judge David Barlow as presider and Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett as (b)(1)(B) referral judge. Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett no longer assigned to the case as presider. (alf)
|
|
Filing 6
COMPLAINT against Brian D Doubles, Synchrony Bank (Originally received by the court on 9/7/2022). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Frederick O Silver. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet 1) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett (ks)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Email Filing and Notification Form by Frederick O Silver (ks)
|
|
Filing 5
DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint, and Civil Cover Sheet. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet 1)(ks) Modified filed incorrectly will file complaint again. on 9/14/2022 (ks).
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: 1. The court will screen this action under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) and DUCivR 3-2(b). 2. The time to serve the complaint is tolled until further order of the court. 3. If the action is allowed to proceed, the court will order service of process on Defendant(s). 4. Plaintiff must not file any motions or other documents during the time the case is screened or until the court orders otherwise. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 9/13/2022. (ks) Modified to add additional information from order on 9/13/2022 (ks).
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE to Plaintiff - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return #the form on this link To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not file the Consent Form in the case.Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Frederick O Silver. Form due by 9/28/2022. (alf)
|
|
Filing 2
DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Electronic notification Form, Summonses, and Marshalls Forms. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Electronic Notification Form, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Marshals Form, #6 Marshals Form)(ks)
|
|
Filing 1
**SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C Bennett for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 9/7/2022) filed by Plaintiff Frederick O Silver. (ks)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
