Shovah v. Mercure et al
Michael Shova |
Gary Mercure and Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, New York, Inc. |
2:2011cv00201 |
August 10, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Vermont |
Burlington Office |
Washington |
William K. Sessions |
Assault, Libel, and Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 153 OPINION AND ORDER: this case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 3/18/2015. (law) |
Filing 151 OPINION AND ORDER granting 142 Motion for Summary Judgment and the federal claims brought under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 are dismissed as untimely; granting 146 Motion to Amend 1 Complaint. The Court orders supplemental briefing as to whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 over the remaining state law claims, to be filed within thirty days of this opinion and order. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 8/27/2014. (law) |
Filing 131 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 109 Motion for Leave to Appeal. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 11/5/2013. (jam) Text clarified on 11/5/2013 (jlh). |
Filing 105 OPINION AND ORDER denying 90 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 9/3/2013. (law) (Main Document 105 replaced on 9/3/2013) (law). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.