Tate v. C.E. Bradley Laboratories, Inc.

Plaintiff: Christopher A. Tate
Defendant: C.E. Bradley Laboratories, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2012cv00216
Filed: September 19, 2012
Court: Vermont District Court
Office: Burlington Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: William K. Sessions
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 11, 2013 14 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER denying without prejudice 6 Motion to Dismiss; denying without prejudice 8 Motion for Appointment of Counsel; granting 9 Motion to Amend Complaint; denying without prejudice 10 Motion to Toll the Statute of Limitations; denying without prejudice 12 Motion for an Order Requiring Mediation;. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 7/11/2013. (jam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tate v. C.E. Bradley Laboratories, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher A. Tate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C.E. Bradley Laboratories, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.