Jamil v. State of Vermont Judicial Administration et al
Taifoor Jamil |
State of Vermont Judicial Administration, Chittenden District Court, Vermont Attorney General's Office, Chittenden County State's Attorney, Office of the, Chittenden Unit for Special Investigations, South Burlington Police Department, Burlington Police Department, Two Undisclosed Individual, South Burlington School District, Agency of Human Services, Vermont Department of Labor and Vermont Human Rights Commission |
2:2014cv00145 |
July 11, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Vermont |
Burlington Office |
Chittenden |
William K. Sessions |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 OPINION AND ORDER: 2 MOTION to Appoint and Order an Independent Imperial Transparent Grand Jury Investigation, 29 MOTION to Save Protect and Ensure My Children's Life, Safety and Well-Being, 30 MOTION to Identify Two Undisclosed Indi vidual Defendants are denied; 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, 20 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and/or for More Definite Statement, 22 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, 24 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, 26 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim are granted. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an Amended Complaint within 30 days except with respect to the State Defendants. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 2/4/2015. (law) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.