McGahan v. State of Vermont
Petitioner: Glenn E. McGahan
Respondent: State of Vermont
Case Number: 5:2012cv00017
Filed: January 25, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Vermont
Office: Rutland Office
County: Windsor
Presiding Judge: John M. Conroy
Presiding Judge: Christina Reiss
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 36 OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; dismissing Petitioner's 1 Complaint, denying 10 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 § 2254 , and granting Respondent's 27 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Christina Reiss on 5/3/2013. (pac) Text clarified on 5/3/2013 (law).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McGahan v. State of Vermont
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Glenn E. McGahan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Vermont
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?